CEA Commissions and Committees 
 CEA Governance 
 CEA Grants & Awards 
 CEA Listservs 
 CEA Representative Assembly (CEARA) 
 CEA-Retired Members (CEA-R) 
 CEA Student Program (CEASP) 
 Connecticut Education Foundation (CEF) 
 Contact Us 
 Directories 
 Join CEA 
 Local & NEA Affiliates 
 Member Benefits 
 NEA Representative Assembly (NEARA) 
 Publications 
 Retirement 
 Uniserv (union representatives) 
 
 Local President's home page 
 
 Contracts 
 Contract Language 
 Research 
 Salary Schedules 
 
 CEASP home page 
 
 Activities and Lesson Plans 
 Education Initiatives 
 Education Organizations 
 Education Policy Sites 
 Grant Opportunities 
 Online & Interactive Resources 
 Online Publications 
 Regional Education Service Centers 
 Research Resources 
 Teacher Favorites 
 
 BEST Resources 
 Certification in Connecticut 
 HCR Workshops 
 New Teacher Resources 
 Professional Development 
 Special Education 
 
 In The News 
 Indoor Air Quality 
 NCLB 
 Saving Money 
 What's New 
 
Home Jobs Contact Us Join CEA Search Home
 
CEA
Member Login:
Enter email  (optional)
  Login Help
Remember me


Spellings to Appeal Court Ruling on NCLB
Print Friendly Version       Email to a Friend

Education Week
Published online February 1, 2008
by The Associated Press

The U.S. Department of Education said Friday it will ask a federal appeals court to reconsider a ruling in a lawsuit related to No Child Left Behind Act funding.

School districts in three states including Michigan and the nation's largest teachers' union have sued the federal government, arguing that schools should not have to comply with requirements of the education law that aren't funded by the federal government.

On Jan. 7, a three-judge panel of the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Cincinnati sided with the plaintiffs by a 2-1 decision.

The appeals court majority said No Child Left Behind fails to provide clear notice as to who bears the additional costs of compliance. The court majority said statutes enacted under the spending clause of the U.S. Constitution must provide clear notice to the states of their liabilities if they accept federal funding under those statutes.

The U.S. Department of Education is asking all active judges on 6th Circuit Court of Appeals to rehear the case.

"We think we have a very strong case," Education Secretary Margaret Spellings said Friday. "We don't believe No Child Left Behind is an unfunded mandate."

Spellings said that if the appeals court decision were to stand, it could undermine efforts to improve education.

Plaintiffs include the Pontiac, Mich., school district and eight districts in Texas and Vermont, along with National Education Association affiliates in several states.

They claim federal funding is not keeping pace with additional mandates required by No Child Left Behind, requiring schools to pay from local and state sources to keep up.

Video & Photo Gallery

Watch Videos

View Photos
Teachers